Files
strix/strix/skills/custom/api_spec_testing.md
T

62 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown

---
name: api_spec_testing
description: Spec-driven API pentesting — systematically exercise every endpoint from an ingested OpenAPI/Swagger/Postman inventory for authz, injection, and business-logic flaws
---
# API Spec Testing
When a target is an API specification (OpenAPI 3.x, Swagger 2.0, or a Postman
collection), the root task lists it under **API Specifications** with the path
to the spec file in the workspace and the authorized base URL(s). Read the spec
file first and build your own endpoint inventory from it — every operation with
its method, path, parameters, request-body schema (resolve `$ref`/`allOf`), and
auth scheme. Do not rediscover the surface by crawling. Walk the inventory
operation-by-operation and prove findings against the live base URL(s), which
are authorized in scope.
## Methodology
**1. Baseline the contract.** For each endpoint, send a well-formed request that
matches the declared schema and record the normal response (status, shape,
auth requirement). This baseline is what every abuse case is compared against.
**2. Enumerate coverage.** Track every `METHOD path` in the inventory and mark it
tested. Undocumented-but-implied siblings are worth probing too (e.g. if
`GET /users/{id}` exists, try `PUT`/`DELETE`/`PATCH` on the same path even when
the spec omits them — specs routinely under-document write operations).
**3. Prioritize by risk.** Object-scoped reads/writes, exports, admin/staff
operations, and anything touching billing, auth, or PII first.
## What to test per endpoint
Test the full range of API weaknesses against each operation, driven by what the
contract reveals — do not treat the following as an exhaustive checklist. The
highest-yield classes on APIs are **authorization** flaws, since the spec hands
you the object identifiers and privilege boundaries to abuse: examples include
BOLA/IDOR (swap `{id}`/`accountId`/`tenantId` across two accounts), BFLA
(privileged operations with a lower-privilege token), and missing/broken auth
(replay with the token stripped or expired against endpoints whose declared auth
says one is required). Beyond authorization, use the declared parameters and
body schema as a launch point for mass assignment and excessive data exposure,
injection and type-confusion on every parameter, and multi-step business-logic
and rate-limit abuse — and follow the contract wherever it suggests something
else worth probing.
## Validation
A finding is only real once reproduced against the live base URL with a
concrete request/response pair. Capture the exact HTTP request (method, path,
headers, body) and the response proving impact (another account's data, a
privileged action succeeding, an injected payload executing). Prefer two-account
diffs for authorization findings: same request, different token, unauthorized
success.
## Tips
- The base URL(s) from the spec are authorized targets — send real traffic.
- Path templates use `{param}`; substitute real values from your baseline.
- For Postman collections, saved example values and environment variables are
strong hints for valid inputs — use them to get past validation quickly.
- Keep a running coverage table so no operation in the inventory is skipped.